We as well as other individuals who called out of the addition of Waverly with this list ended up being literally called shitty by the individual you describe as diplomatic, that was the true point once I stopped being good. Funny how you’re OK with this but demand as any proof from me an evidence of my good will, expecting I’ll spend hours looking for and making screenshots of my words and upload it to some server just so you would say it doesn’t matter anyway because you don’t see it. In the same way being called “shitty” is “diplomatic behavior” in this alt-reality.

And that is just just what angers me personally the essential about any of it situation. Gaslighting and dual criteria. Calling away detailing as bisexual the type who’s most likely gay – as she also utilized your message to spell it out herself – can be an assault on bisexual people now (that’s why I talked about insinuation of biphobia in addition, but of program we bet you didn’t notice it this way either exactly like name-calling is diplomatic) so we shouldn’t have any difficulty because “who’s harmed by that”. Then your description this is certainly harmful because lesbian presence is with in really bad state of program contributes to accusation that speaking about lesbians is hi-jacking bi-visibility week. You actually don’t see any problem for the reason that?

And something of the very disingenuous arguments, we attempt to forbid bi fans from seeing Wav as bi because a write-up for a site that is renowned at queer ladies is simply the just like a viewpoint of a fan free chat porn! Except it’s maybe not. When individuals see an impression they’ll be got by it so it’s already formal. Which in turn can lead to huge stress on the authors and showrunners to stick to that even they planned, or they’ll face the fan wrath if it’s not what. And that is really shitty.

provided the time you’re taking to argue that this really isn’t a grudge carried over from a bi/lesbian fandom war but really a basic argument from somebody who is reasonable to any or all, i do believe it is a lot more than fair in my situation to inquire of one to straight straight back up which claim. You don’t need a screenshot, simply copy/paste something it’s from accusatory you’ve written re:bisexual erasure and link to the article.

I’ll come back to Laura R’s presumably antagonistic line: it’s fine for gay/lesbian visitors to claim her, but We also think it is just a little shitty for all your people into the commentary to whine about other people claiming Waverly as bi.“ We think”

This comment accepts that lesbians have actually a right to claim Waverly, which hits me as pretty diplomatic. She’s maybe not arguing that lesbians shouldn’t claim her, just that bi females might also achieve this and that yes, it is unneeded to insistently refuse to just accept that bi females may claim this character too. When recognized inside the context associated with whole remark ‘a small shitty’ is not specially confrontational and even suggest. Also if we had been to simply accept that ‘a little shitty’ is really a shitty term option, Laura R.’s remark arrived hours after very first remark on how calling Waverly bi implies that all queer women can be bisexual by standard, and so I think it is disingenuous to pretend that the tone escalated in reaction to other people whenever in fact it absolutely was accusatory from the get-go. How do I be gaslighting you if the time stamps from all of these reviews are plainly noticeable?

Once more, the standard argument that this character is in fact homosexual and never bi, is it self maybe perhaps not ‘a small shitty’. In reviewing the proof presented, I’m inclined to concur to you that Waverly is almost certainly not bi. What exactly is shitty, is the fact that you’ve twisted this right into a full instance of lesbian erasure additionally the presumption that Heather believes we’re all bisexual by standard. There are more choices that may give an explanation for decision to add Waverly in this list:

-it’s too early to provide her any label after all -Heather has an alternate interpretation that she will fairly backup considering that the evidence does not instantly point out a single summary -Heather, a television journalist and also require usage of promo materials from showrunners etc, has a document someplace having a blurb by which Waverly is called bisexual -Heather made an error because this woman is individual, and could opt to eliminate Waverly through the list or describe her as being a lesbian later on